Well said, Dave.
And you make a good point. I do understand that bands have to do things for the sake of business, but even if we accept that it has to be done, wasn't this a ridiculous way to go about it?
If I'm not mistaken, the idea was to draw the "younger," pop/R&B-oriented crowd into buying CDs by SG, Rippingtons, etc.
Wouldn't it have made more sense to have the bands contribute to two or three tracks on albums by Jeffrey Osborne, et al, and throw in some attention-getting instrumental solos, the kind that would make the typical pop/R&B listener go: "Who was that?"
I just don't see how a one-song guest appearance by any of these singers on a jazz album (even a smooth jazz album) is going to attract anybody who isn't already a fan of the instrumental group.
Or, perhaps a full album collaboration. Not that I want that from SG, but why just one or two ballads?
That kind of thing works for Santana because he has several different guests and, well, he's Santana - ergo, he's not one who's done 20-plus albums of instrumental music. But the logic of thrusting it upon instrumental groups in the manner that they did it is beyond my comprehension.